Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rudisill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1915No. 5490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Bryan County; J. L. Ra-ppolee, Judge. Action by J. Henry Johnson against Isaac J. Rudi-sill. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by plaintiff in error against defendant in error on two negotiable promissory notes. Hereafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. The action was.-commenced in a justice court, where judgment was rendered for plaintiff, from which an appeal was taken by defendant to .the county court.

The answer admits the execution of the notes sued on. Plaintiff in his own behalf testified: That he was the state manager for the National Life Insurance Company, of Montpelier, Vt., and B. D. James was agent of said company during the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Freeman-Sipes Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Opperud v. TwedellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Eatmon v. PenlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API