Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Clapp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1953No. 34835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

Action was for damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defendants’ negligence. The judgment for the plaintiff was in accord with a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendants seek reversal on grounds of a failure of the proof to show negligence on the part of the defendants, and that the court erred in overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the evidence and their motion for a directed verdict.

On trial, it was shown that the plaintiff sustained bodily injuries while a fare-paying passenger on a bus being driven by the defendant George, in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Motor Carriers, Inc. v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Walker v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. LarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Opperud v. TwedellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Eckroat v. LandrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Oklahoma Transportation Company v. ClaibornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. North v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Flippen v. Union Transportation CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API