Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hanley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint to the District Court of East Norfolk, alleging the keeping, at Weymouth, on January 10, 1885, of certain intoxicating liquors, with intent unlawfully to sell the same in this Commonwealth.

Read the full summary

Complaint to the District Court of East Norfolk, alleging the keeping, at Weymouth, on January 10, 1885, of certain intoxicating liquors, with intent unlawfully to sell the same in this Commonwealth. Trial in the Superior Court, before Knowlton, J,, who allowed a bill of exceptions, in substance as follows: The government offered evidence tending to show that the defendant, on and before January 13,1885, kept a certain saloon in Weymouth; that, on said January 13, three officers, who were witnesses, visited the saloon, which then contained a bar, bottles, jugs, glasses, and a barrel of cider…

1Opinion of the CourtC. Allen, J.

The first point taken by the defendant is settled by the decision in Commonwealth v. Fontain, 127 Mass. 452, and the second by that in Commonwealth v. Scott, 123 Mass. 239.

Exceptions overruled.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Commonwealth v. FontainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. State v. Van BurenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API