Robinson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was indicted, prosecuted and convicted of the offense of pursuing the business or occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in a county where prohibition had been adopted.
1. Appellant moved to quash the indictment on the grounds that the Act making it an offense to pursue the business or occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in local option territory is unconstitutional, and it does not negative the exceptions. The indictment in this case is in conformity with the indictment approved by this court in Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226, 128 S. W. Rep., 125,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fitch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Gearheart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.