Legal Opinion

State v. Van Buren

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1910No. 7615PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Richland, Spring term, 1910. Indictment against H. Van Burén for practicing medicine without a license. Prom order discharging defendant on plea of former jeopardy, State appeals. cite: 20 S. C., 406; 3 Rich. R„ 174; 13 S. C., 392; 32 S. C., 94; 59 S. C., 274; 76 S. C., 16. cites: 76 S. C., 74; 1 Rich., 172; 10 Rich., 148; 13 S. C., 392; 48 S. C., 384; 8 Rich., 312; 47 S. C., 166; 54 S. C., 237; 163 U. S., 661; 93 U. S., 18; 144 U. S., 310; Dud, 42; 2 McM., 395; 65 S. C., 190; 108 Ga., 776.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered 'by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant was indicted for practicing medicine without the license required by statute. The Circuit Court, without submitting the issue to the jury, sustained the plea of former jeopardy and acquittal, and the State appeals. The portion of the first indictment material to the issue was: “* * * The jurors of and for the county aforesaid, in the State aforesaid, upon their oath, present: That H. Van Burén, * * * on the fifth day of November, in the year of our Rord- one thousand nine hundred and eight, * * * did practice medicine,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

State v. DeweesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
State v. SwitzerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
Commonwealth v. HanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
State v. CorbittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
United States v. St. ClairDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1945
State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.