Legal Opinion

Peck v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,241PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The appellant presented to the appellee, for allowance, an itemized account for commissions claimed on divers sums of money, other than taxes, paid to him as treasurer of Tippecanoe county. The appellee refused to allow any part of his account, and he appealed from its decision to the circuit court of the county. There the appellee’s motion to strike out each of the twenty-one items of the appellant’s account, for the reason that it was not a proper and lawful charge in his favor against the appellee, was sustained by the court as to each and all of the items. To this ruling the appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myers v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Stott v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Dunn v. TouseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Foster v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Fellenzer v. VanValzahIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Board of Commissioners v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API