Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Tousey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8609PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— This action was brought by the appellant to obtain the partition of certain - real estate, in Perry county. In her complaint, she alleged in substance that she was the owner, in fee simple, of the undivided one-third part of such real estate, as a tenant in common with the appellees, who were the owners of the other undivided two-thirds part thereof; that the appellees also claimed to be the owners of the appellant’s undivided one-third part of said real estate, under and by virtue of a deed purporting to have been executed by her, which deed, she averred, was illegal and void as to her,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Stott v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hamar v. MedskerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. School Town of Princeton v. GebhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fellenzer v. VanValzahIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Hogan v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API