Legal Opinion

Fellenzer v. VanValzah

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1884No. 11,241PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

The record of this cause shows that on the ■30th day of March, 1882, the appellee, Martha VanValzah, the plaintiff below, filed what is called her substituted complaint against the appellants, Jacob Smock, Alexander Smock, Martha W. Fellenzer, Joseph F. Fellenzer, George W. Fellenzer, Catharine Fellenzer and William H. Fisk, as defendants. Following the copy of this “substituted complaint,” as it appears in the transcript, is a foot-note by the clerk to the effect that such substituted complaint, “ it seems, is the only complaint on file in this action ; the plaintiff seems to have amended…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Stott v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McCourt v. Singers-BiggerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wheeler v. Abilene Nat. Bank Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Fitzgerald v. GoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API