Hause v. Schesel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
This case, as to the matters covered by this appeal, involves two causes of action brought in the alternative. One is based on the law of contracts. The other on the law of torts. The complaint is an either/or proposition, and there is nothing wrong with that. - However, the result must follow the request in being founded either on contract or tort liability. It is either fish or fowl, not both.. What is puzzling to us, although the point seems not to have been raised at. the trial court level nor before us, -is that-the jury verdict appears to combine the two causes of action. At least the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee Bedding Co. v. GraebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Rainer v. SchulteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Eycleshimer v. Van AntwerpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Gegare v. Fox River Land & Loan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Messenger v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1847
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swickey v. Silvey CompaniesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Hussong v. FroelichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Marker v. Preferred Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Gilbert v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Scheideler Ex Rel. Tlusty v. Smith & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.