Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. United States Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1970No. 165PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The plaintiff owned a boat that was insured by the defendant under a one-year policy which contained a territorial restriction clause that excluded coverage of the vessel while afloat on the waters of the Great Lakes. A special endorsement and additional premium were required for Great Lakes coverage. The issue of whether the incident causing the loss of plaintiff’s boat occurred on territorial waters or the Great Lakes is not before us on appeal. If the jury had found the incident had occurred on territorial waters, the loss would have been covered under plaintiff’s basic policy. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Trible v. Tower InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kiviniemi v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wirsing v. KrzeminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jolin v. OsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lewis v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Green v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API