Legal Opinion
Swickey v. Silvey Companies
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 19, 1999No. 91,903PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 Appellants contend the trial court should not have entered summary judgment in favor of Appellee Insurance Resources Agency, Inc. [Agency], After review of the record before us, we conclude that the judgment must be affirmed in part and reversed in part.
¶ 2 We review entry of summary judgment de novo. Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Carp., 1996 OK 136, ¶ 2, 920 P.2d 122, 124; Carmichael v. Better, 1996 OK 48, ¶2, 914 P.2d 1051, 1053. All facts shown by the evidentiary materials, and inferences therefrom, are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- McAlvain v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Rotan v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hernandez v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Slover v. Equitable Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Kutz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Cosper v. Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.