Legal Opinion
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2002No. 38582PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*861OPINION
By the Court,
Agosti, J.:
The City of Las Vegas seeks an extraordinary writ directing the district court to vacate its order holding that NRS 207.260 is unconstitutional. At the time relevant to this petition, NRS 207.260 provided in part that “a person who annoys or molests a minor is guilty of a misdemeanor.”1 For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the district court did not err in holding that the statute was facially void and unconstitutional. Therefore, we deny the City’s petition.
On September 13, 2000, the City filed a criminal complaint charging real party in interest…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CastanedaNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC v. ChanosNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Ford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.