Carroll v. Bristol Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The Defendants have brought this civil rights action before the Court by filing a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs 1) First Amendment claim, 2) Fifth Amendment Due Process claims, 3) punitive damage claims against Bristol Township, Chief of Police John Tegzes and the individual defendants in their official capacity, 4) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Bristol Township and Chief of Police John Tegzes, and 5) Plaintiff Patricia Carroll’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, In reply to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs’ have withdrawn their First Amendment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Jones v. ChieffoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Schor v. NORTH BRADDOCK BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011