Legal Opinion
Schor v. NORTH BRADDOCK BOROUGH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 2011No. 2:11-mj-00397PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the Court are DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (Document No. 6) with brief in support (Document No. 7), and Plaintiffs MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (Document No. 10). Accordingly, the motion is now fully briefed and ripe for disposition.
II. Background
As the law requires, all disputed facts and inferences are resolved in favor of Plaintiff, the non-moving party. The following…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Cumberland CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Powell v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- BLESSING v. CITY OF LATROBEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Jane Doe, individually and as parent and natural guardian of John Doe 1 and John Doe 2, minors v. Cumberland Valley School District, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Madden v. Petland Summerville LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.