Legal Opinion

Thompson Optical Institute v. Thompson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Robert A. Thompson, defendant herein, R. A. Thompson, and Dr. Thompson are one and the same person.

The defendant, by his counsel, has carried on a vigorous defense to plaintiff’s suit. H'e has asserted the invalidity of the organization of the plaintiff corporation known as “Thompson Optical Institute,” and also avers the illegality of the contract upon which this suit is founded.

A knowledge of the facts is essential to a solution of the questions involved herein. For a number of years prior to the organization of the corporation, defendant Thompson had carried on an optical business under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  2. Pickett v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Oregon & Cal. R. R. v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Municipal Security Co. v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Martin v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re the Marriage of FleegeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bakee Production Credit Ass'n v. Long Creek Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Timberline Equipment Company, Inc. v. DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Sisemore v. Standard Optical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API