Legal Opinion
Martin v. Murphy
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1891No. 15,261PublishedCited by 23 opinions
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
McBride, J. —
The only errors assigned in this case are on the action of the circuit court in sustaining demurrers to each paragraph of the complaint.
The complaint is in two paragraphs. By the first paragraph the appellant seeks to have the appellee enjoined from practicing medicine in the town of Salem, and by the second to recover liquidated damages for alleged breach of contract not to practice medicine at that place.
The contract is in writing, and is made a part of each paragraph of the complaint. It is as follows :
“Salem, Washington county,Indiana.
“October 1, 1887.
'“Articles of agreement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Duffy v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Smalley v. GreeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Beard v. DennisIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- McCurry v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.