Legal Opinion
Timberline Equipment Company, Inc. v. Davenport
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1973PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for equipment rentals against the defendant Dr. Bennett and two others. In addition to making a general denial, Dr. Bennett alleged as a defense that the rentals were to a de facto corporation, Aero-Eabb Corp., of which Dr. Bennett was an incorporator, director and shareholder. He also alleged plaintiff was estopped from denying the corporate character of the organization to whom plaintiff rented the equipment. The trial court held for plaintiff. Dr. Bennett, only, appeals.
On January 22, 1970, Dr. Bennett signed articles of incorporation for Aero-Fabb Co. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Namerdy v. GeneralcarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Swindel v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Cranson v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Robertson v. LevyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Marsters v. Umpqua Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- A to Z Rental Center v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Smith v. Halliburton Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Peterson v. HarvilleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1977
- Weiss v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Boslow Family Ltd. Partnership v. Glickenhaus & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.