Legal Opinion

Northwest Adjustment Co. v. Akers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

In an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant Akers, plaintiff recovered judg ment for an amount in excess of $250 and caused an execution to be issued thereon and a notice of garnishment to be served on the county clerk of Multnomah county. At that time there was due and owing from the county to Akers $34.20 as a juror’s fees.

Section 3-606, Oregon Code 1930, declares that any “salary”, “wages”, “credits” or “other personal property”, in the possession or under the control of any county shall be subject to garnishment, and provides that the process in such proceeding may be served…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. King & King v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Salem Mills Co. v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Whale v. GatchOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ingham v. Harper & SonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Keene v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whittier v. WhittierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API