State v. Black
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
In this appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erroneously allowed the district attorney to cross-examine and impeach a State’s witness and erroneously admitted incompetent evidence. For the reasons enunciated herein, we hold that the defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.
On the evening of 16 April 1981, Artemus Peterson, then eight years old, and his brother Monte Peterson, seven years old, were approached by a man as they walked down a street near their home in Winston-Salem. The man asked if they knew -where someone named Ronnie lived. Acting…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985