Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 172A81PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

In this appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erroneously allowed the district attorney to cross-examine and impeach a State’s witness and erroneously admitted incompetent evidence. For the reasons enunciated herein, we hold that the defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

On the evening of 16 April 1981, Artemus Peterson, then eight years old, and his brother Monte Peterson, seven years old, were approached by a man as they walked down a street near their home in Winston-Salem. The man asked if they knew -where someone named Ronnie lived. Acting…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API