State v. Norman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
I. Defendant Ella Norman’s Appeal
In one of her assignments of error, defendant Ella Norman contends that the State was not able to show that she ever agreed to sell any amount of cocaine to the State’s witness Patillo, and that the trial court therefore erred in denying her motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence. We disagree. The evidence that Ella Norman called Patillo and told him that she knew a source that could supply Patillo with drugs Patillo needed or a larger amount of drugs needed by Patillo’s friend, coupled with the evidence that in this conversation Ella…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. SiddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. CrummyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.