Legal Opinion

Kane Properties, LLC v. City of Hoboken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 2013PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

The matter before this Court relates to the claim of a property owner who successfully sought a use variance before the local Zoning Board, only to see that grant of relief reversed by the municipality’s governing body. Believing that the decision of the governing body was tainted because one of the municipal attorneys who participated in the governing body’s proceedings had represented the principal objector to the project before the Zoning Board, the property owner filed a complaint to commence an action in lieu of prerogative writs.

In that proceeding, the trial court agreed that the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Griggs v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. A.M.C. v. P.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  2. Mondsini v. Local Fin. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. In re Advisory Letter No. 3-11Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. R. Neumann & Co. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  5. 440 COMPANY-CARRIAGE HOUSE, LP VS. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK (L-0123-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API