Legal Opinion

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Hannon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 3 Div. 679PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit is upon a policy of life insurance.

There was demurrer to the complaint. The Code form for the complaint requires that the period covered by the policy and the date of the death be averred, in order that the pleading may show whether or not death occurred pending the life of the policy. Pence v. Mutual Ben. L. Ins. Co., 180 Ala. 584, 61 So. 817; Eminent Household Columbian Woodmen v. Gallant, 194 Ala. 681, 69 So. 884; Sov. Camp W. O. W. v. Ward, 196 Ala. 327, 71 So. 404; Locomotive Eng., etc., Ass’n v. Hughes, 201 Ala. 58, 77 So. 352.

In Ex parte Comm. Life Ins. Co., 204 Ala. 561, 86…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Wise v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API