Gilliland v. Order of Ry. Conductors of America
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is an action on a mutual benefit insurance ■ contract, insuring the plaintiff’s intestate against death and disabilities arising from accident. The ferial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, from which he appeals.
The form of complaint prescribed by section 9531 of the Code (form 12), for actions on life insurance policies, has been held not applicable to suits on accident and mutual benefit contracts. United States Health & Accident Co. v. Veitch, 161 Ala. 630, 50 So. 95; Locomotive Engineers’ Mutual Life & Accident Ass’n v. Hughes, 201 Ala. 58, 77 So. 352. And the absence of an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scharfenburg v. Town of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Going v. Alabama Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CarlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Argo v. Sylacauga Mercantile Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Locomotive Engineers' Mut. Life & Accident Ins. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Inter-Ocean Insurance Company v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. FeltmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Schroder.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Modern Order of Praetorians v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.