Legal Opinion

United States v. General Electric Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 4, 1949No. Civ. A. 1364PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

The Pleadings

Pursuant to § 4 1 of the Sherman Act, § 15 2 of the Clayton Act and § 74 3 of the Wilson Tariff Act, the plaintiff, the United States of America, filed a complaint to prevent and restrain alleged continuing violations of §§ 1 4 and 2 5 of the Sherman Act, § 3 6 of the Clayton Act and § 73 7 of the Wilson Tariff Act respectively. It named the following defendants:

1. General Electric Company, described as a New York corporation, having lamp plants in Ohio, New Jersey, Missouri, Massachusetts, New York and California, which together with its subsidiaries is…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. A. & E. Plastik Pak Co., Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API