Legal Opinion

Woods v. Monroe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1868PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Sanilac Circuit. The bill in this case was filed to quiet the title of the complainant to., certain real estate in Sanilac county, the title to which was derived through an administrator’s sale. The case was heard on pleadings and proofs, and a decree granted in favor of complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley Oh. J.

The bill in this case is filed to quiet the title of the complainant to certain lands in Sanilac County, to which he derives title through sales made by the administrator of Samuel W. Monroe, of whom the defendants are heirs at law. The defendants contest the right of complainant to the decree he prays for, on grounds which it will be convenient to consider separately.

I. It is claimed that the case is not a proper one for relief in equity, inasmuch as the complainant claims by his bill a complete legal title, which could be fully examined and settled at law, and a part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mundy v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Howard v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API