Legal Opinion

People v. Downing

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1995No. D020943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

In this case we have explored the difficult question of the extent to which a police officer may rely upon computer-generated data furnished by the judicial system in carrying out searches and seizures. We conclude, consistent with the recent announcement by the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. Evans (1995) 514 U.S._[131 L.Ed.2d 34, 115 S.Ct. 1185], 1 that where errors exist in such data based on mistakes made solely within the judicial system, the deterrent effect of the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule will not be served by suppressing evidence…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. Arron C.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Bogard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Barajas v. City of Rohnert ParkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API