Legal Opinion

Barajas v. City of Rohnert Park

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 5, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-05157-MEJPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 33

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge

INTRODUCTION

This case considers the Fourth Amendment privacy rights of co-inhabitants of probationers. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Defs.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 26; Pis.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 33. Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion as set forth below.

BACKGROUND1

A. Factual Background

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reed v. SheppardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  2. Lipford v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Lipford v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Rehn v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. Soto-Lopez v. FalkeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API