Legal Opinion
People v. Ferguson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 30, 2003No. C036911PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Following denial of his motion to suppress the evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), 1 defendant Robert Bruce Ferguson pleaded no contest to a felony charge of possessing a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) The trial court sentenced him to three years in state prison, suspended the sentence, and committed him to the California Rehabilitation Center as a narcotics addict. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 3051.)
Defendant claims the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence, which had been discovered by police in a search following a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hutto v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- County of Placer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Maxwell CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Pour CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015