Snow v. Holmes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
Action upon a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage.
The original complaint was filed August 2, 1880, and the amended complaint August 10, 1882. In both complaints is set forth a copy of the note, and attached to them is a copy of the mortgage. The note is dated March 1, 1878, and is payable on demand with interest; the mortgage is dated June 1, 1878. In the mortgage the note is correctly described, except that its date is given as February 8, 1878.
In the amended complaint it is alleged that the mortgage was made to secure the note sued on; that at the time the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Hatch v. New Zealand Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Macfadden v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Browning v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Donleavey v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Scatena v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.