Legal Opinion

Browning v. McNear

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1904No. S.F. No. 3081PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover $6,632.27 alleged to be the balance due him for 21,277 sacks of barley sold and delivered by him to defendant, at the agreed price of 81-j- cents per one hundred pounds.

The defendant, who had received, accepted, and used 20,445 sacks thereof, claimed that the original transaction was no more than an executory agreement for the sale of the 21,277 sacks, at the price named, and alleged, by way of counterclaim, that “said barley was to be delivered to said defendant free on board barge at Eddy’s Landing, California, in good order and condition, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Beirne and Burnside v. . DordNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  4. Sutro v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Snow v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. North Alaska Salmon Co. v. Hobbs, Wall & Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Guipre v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Browning v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kenney v. GroganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API