Legal Opinion

Scatena v. Lawson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1928No. Docket No. 6512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNARD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, the trial court having held that the answers failed to set up a defense. The action is one brought to foreclose a real estate mortgage and a chattel mortgage, both made by William H. Lawson and Agnes May Lawson, his wife, and A. G. Perelli-Minetti and Jeanne Perelli-Minetti, his wife, to the plaintiff, securing the payment of one promissory note for $41,000, dated June 9, 1921, and due five years after date. The complaint, filed June 16, 1926, is in the usual form. It alleges, among other things, the payment of interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Snow v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hawn v. Seventy-Six Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Thurgood v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Stafford v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API