Scatena v. Lawson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARNARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, the trial court having held that the answers failed to set up a defense. The action is one brought to foreclose a real estate mortgage and a chattel mortgage, both made by William H. Lawson and Agnes May Lawson, his wife, and A. G. Perelli-Minetti and Jeanne Perelli-Minetti, his wife, to the plaintiff, securing the payment of one promissory note for $41,000, dated June 9, 1921, and due five years after date. The complaint, filed June 16, 1926, is in the usual form. It alleges, among other things, the payment of interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Snow v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hawn v. Seventy-Six Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Thurgood v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Stafford v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955