Legal Opinion
Sherwood v. Radovsky
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
In this action of tort the defendant rested at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence and made a motion for a directed verdict which was denied subject to her exception. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.
It could have been found that on March 3, 1943, at about 11:30 a.m., the plaintiff was, a passenger in an automobile owned by her and operated by her husband which had collided with an automobile which was referred to in the testimony as the “Boudreau car.” The collision occurred on Huntington Avenue, Boston, near the intersection of Louis Prang Street. The “Boudreau car,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Williams v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Kelleher v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Hennessey v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Folan v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Levin v. Twin Tanners, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Costello v. HansenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Glavine v. GaudetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Mlynarchik v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Ramus v. Town Taxi, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.