Legal Opinion

Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have resulted from a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff and one of the defendant’s trolley cars. It was tried by a judge and a jury. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s exceptions to the refusal of the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant and to strike out certain testimony.

1. It was not error to refuse to direct a verdict for the defendant.

*422The following facts were not in dispute: The collision occurred in the evening when the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Lemay v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Brown v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Gross v. Boston, W. N.Y. St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Wilborg v. DenzellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Joughin v. Federal Motor Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API