Van Dyke v. Geary
District Court, D. Arizona
In Equity. Suit by Ida A. Van Dyke and Cleve W. Van Dyke against W. Paul Geary, Amos W. Cole, and Frank A. Jones, members of the Corporation Commission of the State of Arizona, the Corporation Commission, and George P. Bullard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and Norman J. Johnson, County Attorney of Gila County, State of Arizona.
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTEDDE, District Judge.
This is an application for an interlocutory injunction, made in pursuance of section 266 of the Judicial Code. Complainants and defendants, and each and all of them, are citizens of the state of Arizona, and this suit is one arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States, other than those requiring diversity of citizenship for federal jurisdiction.
The Arizona corporation commission is a legally constituted board of the state of Arizona, exercising quasi judicial, legislative, and ministerial functions; the defendants Geary, Cole, and Jones are the duly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yankee Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Haddad v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Conway v. VersluisArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1931
- Bank of Indianola v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.