El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, District Judge.
This ease comes before the court on motion'to dismiss and agreed statement of facts. The motion to dismiss the bill of complaint is on the following grounds: First, that it appears upon the face of said bill that the facts therein stated are not sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action in equity; second, that this court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter thereof. The ease comes within the provisions of section 266 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 380). At a hearing heretofore had before three judges, a preliminary injunction was issued and is still in full…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- T. R. Miller Mill Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Atchison. T. & S. F. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- MOUNTAIN STATES, ETC. v. Ariz. Corp. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Montgomery v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999