Bank of Indianola v. Miller
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentAnderson, J.
Section 90 of our Constitution prohibits, among other things, the legislature from xaassing special laws regulating the rate of interest on money. It was held in Loan Association v. McElveen, 100 Miss. 16, 56 So. 187, that interest Laws were of general public concern; that, under this constitutional provision, social laws regulating the rate of interest on money could not be passed. In Halsell v. Insurance Company, 105 Miss. 268, 62 So. 235, 645, Ann. Cas. 1916E, 229, it was held that, although no sxoecial law could be passed regulating the rate of interest, under this constitutional…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.