Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haddad v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1921No. Criminal No. 513PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment convicting appellants (jointly informed against) of violating an order of the Arizona Corporation Commission made pursuant to chapter 130, Acts of the Fourth Legislature, Session Laws of 1919. This act is entitled:

“An act providing for the supervision, regulation and conduct of the transportation of persons, freight and property for compensation over the .public highways of the state of Arizona by automobiles, jitney busses, auto-trucks, stages and auto-stages.”

And it provides a somewhat comprehensive scheme to regulate, intrastate transportation of freight…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Visco v. State Ex Rel. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Peterson v. SundtArizona Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API