Legal Opinion

Oceana, Inc. v. Bryson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 1, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2012-0041Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) OCEANA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0041 (PLF) ) WILBUR ROSS, ) United States Secretary of Commerce, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) OPINION This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ notice that the National Marine Fisheries Service has revised its Incidental Take Statement, thus completing its remand in response to the Court’s August 31, 2015 Opinion and Order. Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. filed a response to the notice,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API