Legal Opinion

Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 9, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2015-0555Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) OCEANA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0555 (PLF) ) WILBUR ROSS, ) United States Secretary of Commerce, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) OPINION Oceana, Inc. challenges a Biological Opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), in which NMFS has determined that the continued operation of Southeast U.S. shrimp fisheries would not jeopardize the continued existence of loggerhead, green, leatherback, hawksbill, and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API