Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jacobs, Malcolm & Burtt v. Voss

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1995No. A065778PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

Food and Agricultural Code section 56707 1 requires the Director of the Department of Food and Agriculture (the Director) to pay compensation out of a specified fund to farm products creditors who suffer losses when a licensed processor, broker, merchant, reseller, or dealer defaults on its obligations. Section 56708 places a ceiling on the amount of such payments. Appellants Jacobs, Malcolm & Burtt, Washington Vegetable Company, United Melon Distributors, and What A Tomato, Inc., brought this proceeding challenging the Director’s allowance of certain claims in amounts below…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. International Business Machines v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Vallejo Development Co. v. Beck Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Schroeder v. Irvine City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. County of Santa Barbara v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaqu (In re in Reg'l Transit Dist.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API