Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Irvine City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 2002No. D038976PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
Appellant Michael J. Schroeder filed this action against the City of Irvine (City), its city council, and four city council members (together respondents) seeking a declaration that respondents’ Vote 2000 program was an illegal expenditure of public funds. Schroeder sought an injunction barring further expenditures on the Vote 2000 program and an order under Code of Civil Procedure section 526a 1 requiring the four council members to reimburse City for all City expenditures made for the Vote 2000 program. Respondents moved to dismiss the action under the so-called…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Regents of University v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v. Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.