Legal Opinion

Cotter v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 7, 2000No. 2:99-cv-71524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This hybrid Section 301 breach of contract action is presently before the Court on the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Thomas N. Cotter, Jr. and Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“referred to herein as ‘DaimlerChrys-ler’ or ‘DCC’ ”). Each party has responded/replied to the opposing party’s motion. Having reviewed the parties’ respective motions, briefs and supporting documents, and having heard the oral arguments of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. V&S Detroit Galvanizing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Harrison v. UAW L599District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Paris v. MACALLISTER MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. d/b/a MICHIGAN CATDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  4. Pedder v. Endo International PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Pedder v. Endo International PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API