Legal Opinion

Harrison v. UAW L599

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 10, 2001No. 00-72345, 00-73368Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on Defendants’ motion summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant General Motors motions are GRANTED and Defendants UAW L599 and UAW L659 motions are GRANTED.

On September 20, 2000 this Court consolidated cases 00-72345 and 00-73368 (Harrison, et al. v. UAW L599, et al. and Schultz, et al. v. UAW L659, et.al, respectively) for discovery purposes only; since the issues pertaining to both these cases are similar, it is appropriate to discuss both cases in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API