Potter v. McCauley
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s motion to remand this case to the state court, on the ground that the petition to remove it from a state court to this court was not timely, requires a determination of the proper meaning and application of the word “otherwise” in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446, subsection (b), as amended in 1949, which provides in relevant part here as follows:
“ (b) The petition for removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within twenty days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Potter v. KahnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Raymond's, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
3Cited by32 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Tech Hills II Associates, Cross-Appellee v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Love v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Quick Erectors, Inc. v. Seattle Bronze Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.