Legal Opinion
Floveyor Internat., Ltd. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1997No. B112606PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Petitioner Floveyor International, Ltd., a British corporation (Floveyor), filed this proceeding to challenge the denial of its motion to quash the service of summons and cross-complaint filed by the real party in interest, Shick Tube-Veyor Corporation (Shick), on the grounds (1) the service of summons and cross-complaint failed to conform with the Hague Convention, 1 and (2) the California courts have no jurisdiction for lack of minimum contacts.
Factual and Procedural Background
Quality Naturally! Foods, Inc. (QNF), not a party to these proceedings, ordered and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- American Express Centurion Bank v. ZaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bolkiah v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Lebel v. MaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- NorthShore Regional Medical Center, LLC v. DillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.