Legal Opinion

Lebel v. Mai

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 2012No. B240914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIMES, J.

The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant and respondent Eric Mai’s motion to quash service of process. Plaintiff and appellant Laura Lebel contends the court erred in finding the substituted service on defendant’s mother in California was inadequate to effectuate valid service on defendant, a resident of England. We conclude the trial court did not err in quashing service, and therefore affirm the order.

BACKGROUND

We summarize only those facts pertinent to the narrow issue presented on appeal. In February 2010, plaintiff entered into a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rocca v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Donel, Inc. v. BadalianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. VivarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Buchanan v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Borsuk v. Superior CourtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  4. Borsuk v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Chinese Theater, LLC v. Starline Tours USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API