Legal Opinion
F. B. Mattson Co. v. Tarte
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 9, 1997No. AC 16993; AC 17049PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendants, Conrad Tarte, Commercial Investments International, Inc. (Commercial Investments), and Great Western Bank, appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien in favor of the plaintiff, F. B. Mattson Company, Inc. (Mattson).1 The defendants claim that the trial court improperly rendered judgment in favor of Mattson in violation of General Statutes § 49-34.2 We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. In the spring of 1995, Mattson, a corporation licensed as a general contractor under Connecticut…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Nichols v. CulverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- The Martin Tire Rubber Co. v. the Kelly Tire RubberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- H. G. Bass Associates, Inc. v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Backros, Inc. v. DaviesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- F. B. Mattson Co. v. TarteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- F. B. Mattson Co. v. TarteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998