Legal Opinion
F. B. Mattson Co. v. Tarte
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1998No. SC 15857PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
This certified appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, F. B. Mattson Company, Inc., to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property located at 161 Hillside Avenue in the city of Waterbury (property). The named defendant, Conrad Tarte, is the current owner of the property. The two other defendants are Commercial Investments International, Inc. (Commercial Investments), the previous owner of the property, and Great Western Bank, the holder of a mortgage on the property.
*236The following facts are relevant to this appeal. In the spring of 1995, the plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Henry F. Raab Connecticut, Inc. v. J. W. Fisher Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Diamond National Corp. v. DwelleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Rollar Construction & Demolition, Inc. v. Granite Rock Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Intercity Development, LLC v. AndradeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- 36 DeForest Avenue, LLC v. CreadoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.