Conover v. Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining respondents’ demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate, and a refusal to amend.
We are convinced the opinion of Judge Peter J. Shields correctly states the facts and the law, and hereby adopt the same as the opinion of this court.
By this proceeding in mandamus it is prayed that the petitioner be adjudged to have been entitled to the rank and grade of supervising stenographer clerk, from December 20, 1934, to the present time and that she be paid certain sums due to her because of her performance of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Oakland v. LyckbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Chubbuck v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stephens v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Ceres v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Vivian v. BloomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Holmgren v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.