Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Ætna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

Tbe appellant abandoned in bis brief tbe exceptions taken to tbe admission and exclusion of evidence during tbe course of tbe trial.

We bave examined those portions of tbe charge relating to tbe first issue and assigned as error and are of tbe opinion that when they are construed contextually with tbe charge as a whole that they are free from reversible error.

Tbe appellant assails in bis brief tbe use by tbe court of tbe pbrase “unable to earn a living himself” as being too all-inclusive, and by way of argument says that one may be unable to earn a living for many reasons not in contemplation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guy v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Hood Ex Rel. Pinetops Banking Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Kennedy v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Gennett v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Iowa Ass'n of School Boards v. Iowa Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Crane v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API